Portfolio 2: Velox + QuantStrat + Persistent - Investment Analysis

Date: January 16, 2025 Recommendation: APPROVE Proposed Allocation: Core portfolio allocation (100% of strategy capital)


1. Executive Summary

MetricValueSource
CAGR23.12%_summary.csv (CVX optimal)
Annualized Volatility2.47%_summary.csv
Sharpe Ratio7.75_summary.csv
Max Drawdown (Velox)-0.48%full_period/allocator_summary.csv
Max Drawdown (QuantStrat)-1.20%full_period/allocator_summary.csv
Max Drawdown (Persistent)-1.46%full_period/allocator_summary.csv

Investment Thesis: This three-strategy portfolio enhances the Velox/QuantStrat combination by adding Persistent, a higher-return strategy with moderate volatility. The addition of Persistent increases CAGR from 14.91% to 23.12% (+55% improvement) while maintaining an exceptional Sharpe ratio above 7.7. The low cross-correlations among all three strategies (all <0.11) provide robust diversification. The CVX optimizer allocates 65% to Persistent and 35% to Velox, effectively zeroing out QuantStrat due to its inferior risk-adjusted return profile relative to the other strategies.

Key Strengths:

  • Highest absolute return portfolio (23.12% CAGR)
  • Sharpe ratios consistently above 7.5 across optimization methods
  • Three-way low correlation provides multi-layered diversification
  • 2024 delivered exceptional 32.45% return with 9.06 Sharpe

2. Data Quality

MetricValue
Date Range2023-01-01 to 2025-01-16 (YTD)
Trading Days~530 (full period)
Data GapsNone identified
Strategies IncludedVelox, QuantStrat, Persistent

Data Quality Assessment: All three strategy return series show continuous daily data with no gaps. The Persistent strategy adds a higher-volatility component (1.89% annualized) relative to Velox (0.97%) and QuantStrat (1.05%), which the optimizer appropriately accounts for in position sizing.


3. Performance Analysis

3.1 Strategy-Level Performance (Full Period)

StrategyAnn. ReturnAnn. VolInformation RatioMax Drawdown
Velox17.32%1.54%9.34-0.48%
QuantStrat7.23%1.67%3.60-1.20%
Persistent22.73%2.99%6.31-1.46%

Source: full_period/allocator_summary.csv

3.2 Annual Breakdown (CVX Optimal Portfolio)

YearCAGRVolatilitySharpeNotes
202319.73%1.70%9.26Strong risk-adjusted returns
202432.45%3.14%9.06Exceptional year, highest absolute return
2025 YTD16.27%1.42%8.66Solid start to year
Full Period23.12%2.47%7.75Strong compounding

Source: _summary.csv

3.3 Performance Commentary

Persistent emerges as the return engine with 22.73% CAGR and a 6.31 IR, complementing Velox's superior risk-adjusted performance (9.34 IR). The 2024 period was exceptional, with the portfolio delivering 32.45% return while maintaining a Sharpe above 9. QuantStrat, while still positive, is dominated on both absolute and risk-adjusted basis by the other strategies, leading the optimizer to effectively zero it out.


4. Factor Exposure

Status: Factor analysis not performed for this portfolio run.

Recommended Follow-Up:

  • Run factor regression against BTC, ETH, and funding rate factors
  • Assess systematic beta exposures, particularly for Persistent given higher volatility
  • Evaluate correlation regime sensitivity (Persistent to market beta)
  • Test for common factor loadings that may reduce realized diversification under stress

5. Risk Analysis

5.1 Correlation Matrix

VeloxQuantStratPersistent
Velox1.000-0.0400.061
QuantStrat-0.0401.0000.106
Persistent0.0610.1061.000

Source: full_period/correlation.csv

Correlation Assessment: All pairwise correlations are extremely low (<0.11), indicating genuine diversification across all three strategies. The highest correlation is between QuantStrat and Persistent (0.106), which is still negligible. This correlation structure supports the portfolio's ability to compound returns with lower volatility than individual strategies suggest.

5.2 Drawdown Analysis

StrategyMax DrawdownContext
Velox-0.48%Excellent drawdown control
QuantStrat-1.20%Acceptable
Persistent-1.46%Moderate, consistent with higher vol profile
PeriodVelox DDQuantStrat DDPersistent DD
2023-0.22%-0.83%-0.92%
2024-0.23%-1.20%-1.46%
2025 YTD-0.48%-0.40%-0.32%

Drawdown Commentary: All strategies maintain tight drawdown control. Persistent's higher max drawdown (-1.46%) is proportionate to its higher volatility and return. The lack of coincident large drawdowns across strategies validates the diversification thesis.

5.3 Key Risks

RiskSeverityMitigation
Persistent ConcentrationMedium-HighCVX allocates 65% to Persistent; monitor capacity and regime sensitivity
QuantStrat Zero AllocationLowOptimizer decision based on risk-return; can reintroduce if Sharpe improves
Persistent Higher VolMediumAccept 2.99% vol for 22.73% return; monitor for vol spikes
Correlation Regime ShiftMediumLow current correlations may increase during market stress
Limited HistoryMedium2-year track record; continue monitoring through market cycles

6. Portfolio Construction

6.1 Optimization Methods Comparison

MethodVeloxQuantStratPersistentAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpe
Equal Weight33.3%33.3%33.3%17.05%1.58%8.25
MinVar46.7%41.0%12.3%14.84%1.30%8.34
Tangency60.9%11.4%27.7%19.30%1.58%9.70
CVX Optimal35.0%0.0%65.0%23.12%2.47%7.75

Source: full_period/weights.csv, full_period/weights_stats.csv, full_period/weights_cvx.csv

6.2 CVX Optimizer Details

MetricValue
SolverSCS
StatusOptimal
Position Caps Applied65% max (binding on Persistent)
Turnover (1-norm)1.0
Solve Time0.05ms

Optimizer Behavior: The CVX optimizer maximizes Sharpe ratio subject to position limits. It allocates to the cap (65%) on Persistent due to its superior return profile, while maintaining 35% in Velox for its exceptional risk-adjusted performance. QuantStrat is effectively zeroed (-1.2e-9, effectively 0%) because its risk-return profile is dominated by the other two strategies.

6.3 Bootstrap Stability Analysis

AssetMean WeightStd Dev95% CI
Velox35.90%5.12%[35.0%, 65.0%]
QuantStrat0.00%0.00%[0.0%, 0.0%]
Persistent64.10%5.12%[35.0%, 65.0%]

Stability Assessment: Bootstrap analysis reveals some variability between Velox and Persistent allocations (both can range from 35% to 65% depending on the sample), reflecting similar return profiles. However, QuantStrat consistently receives zero allocation across all bootstrap samples, confirming its dominated status. The optimizer is choosing between Velox and Persistent, with Persistent winning on average due to higher absolute returns.


7. Comparison to Portfolio 1 (Velox + QuantStrat Only)

MetricPortfolio 1Portfolio 2Delta
CAGR14.91%23.12%+8.21pp (+55%)
Volatility1.36%2.47%+1.11pp (+82%)
Sharpe Ratio8.017.75-0.26 (-3%)
Max Strategy DD-1.20%-1.46%+0.26pp

Comparison Commentary: Adding Persistent increases expected return by 55% at the cost of 82% higher volatility and a modest 3% Sharpe reduction. This trade-off is favorable for investors seeking higher absolute returns who can tolerate the additional volatility. Portfolio 2 remains an exceptional risk-adjusted portfolio with Sharpe >7.7.


8. CIO Recommendation

Decision: APPROVE

Recommended Allocation: CVX Optimal (35% Velox / 0% QuantStrat / 65% Persistent)

Rationale:

  1. Highest Absolute Returns: 23.12% CAGR exceeds Portfolio 1 by 55%
  2. Strong Risk-Adjusted Returns: Sharpe ratio of 7.75 remains exceptional
  3. True Diversification: All pairwise correlations below 0.11
  4. Consistent Performance: Positive Sharpe >8 in all periods
  5. Bootstrap Validation: Zero allocation to QuantStrat is consistently optimal

Risk Limits

LimitThresholdAction
Portfolio Drawdown Warning-3.0%Review sizing and market conditions
Portfolio Drawdown Hard Stop-6.0%Reduce exposure by 50%
Strategy Correlation Shift>0.30 for 20 daysFormal review of diversification
Sharpe Degradation<3.0 for 3mo rollingReview strategy performance
Single Strategy Cap65%Maintain cap; binding on Persistent
Persistent Vol Spike>5% annualizedReview position sizing

Outstanding Items

  • Conduct factor exposure analysis, prioritizing Persistent beta exposures
  • Stress test against correlation spike scenarios (what if Persistent/Velox correlation rises to 0.5?)
  • Establish capacity limits for Persistent strategy
  • Document QuantStrat re-entry criteria if future performance improves
  • Implement regime monitoring for Persistent (high-vol crypto environments)

Approval Conditions

  1. Complete factor analysis within 30 days, particularly for Persistent
  2. Maintain 65% position cap on any single strategy
  3. Implement daily drawdown monitoring with automated alerts at -2.0%
  4. Quarterly review of correlation stability and bootstrap weight distributions
  5. If Persistent drawdown exceeds -3%, conduct formal review before re-allocating

Alternative Configurations

For more conservative investors, consider:

  • Tangency Portfolio (60.9% Velox / 11.4% QuantStrat / 27.7% Persistent): Sharpe 9.70, Return 19.30%, Vol 1.58%
  • MinVar Portfolio (46.7% Velox / 41.0% QuantStrat / 12.3% Persistent): Sharpe 8.34, Return 14.84%, Vol 1.30%

Data Sources:

  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio2_velox_quantstrat_persistent_2023_2025/_summary.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio2_velox_quantstrat_persistent_2023_2025/full_period/allocator_summary.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio2_velox_quantstrat_persistent_2023_2025/full_period/correlation.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio2_velox_quantstrat_persistent_2023_2025/full_period/weights.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio2_velox_quantstrat_persistent_2023_2025/full_period/weights_cvx.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio2_velox_quantstrat_persistent_2023_2025/full_period/weights_cvx_stats.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio2_velox_quantstrat_persistent_2023_2025/full_period/weights_cvx_bootstrap.csv