Portfolio 1: Velox + QuantStrat - Investment Analysis

Date: January 16, 2025 Recommendation: APPROVE Proposed Allocation: Core portfolio allocation (100% of strategy capital)


1. Executive Summary

MetricValueSource
CAGR14.91%_summary.csv (CVX optimal)
Annualized Volatility1.36%_summary.csv
Sharpe Ratio8.01_summary.csv
Max Drawdown (Velox)-0.48%full_period/allocator_summary.csv
Max Drawdown (QuantStrat)-1.20%full_period/allocator_summary.csv

Investment Thesis: This two-strategy portfolio combines Velox (high-frequency/market-neutral) and QuantStrat (systematic trading) to deliver exceptional risk-adjusted returns. The near-zero correlation between strategies (-0.047) provides genuine diversification, while the CVX-optimized allocation (65% Velox / 35% QuantStrat) maximizes Sharpe ratio while respecting position limits. The portfolio achieved a Sharpe ratio above 8.0 across the full 2023-2025 period with extraordinarily low volatility.

Key Strengths:

  • Exceptional Sharpe ratios across all periods (5.0 - 9.6)
  • Near-zero inter-strategy correlation provides true diversification
  • Consistent performance: positive returns in all three years
  • Extremely low drawdowns (<1.2% at strategy level)

2. Data Quality

MetricValue
Date Range2023-01-01 to 2025-01-16 (YTD)
Trading Days~530 (full period)
Data GapsNone identified
Strategies IncludedVelox, QuantStrat

Data Quality Assessment: The dataset spans approximately 2 years of continuous daily data. Both strategy return series show no gaps or anomalies. Factor regression data was not included in this run; recommend adding factor analysis in future iterations to understand systematic exposures.


3. Performance Analysis

3.1 Strategy-Level Performance (Full Period)

StrategyAnn. ReturnAnn. VolInformation RatioMax Drawdown
Velox17.69%1.54%9.53-0.48%
QuantStrat6.87%1.64%3.48-1.20%

Source: full_period/allocator_summary.csv

3.2 Annual Breakdown (CVX Optimal Portfolio)

YearCAGRVolatilitySharpeNotes
202314.52%1.19%8.86Strong risk-adjusted returns
202419.40%1.61%9.57Best absolute and risk-adjusted year
2025 YTD10.01%1.19%5.06Solid start to year
Full Period14.91%1.36%8.01Consistent excellence

Source: _summary.csv

3.3 Performance Commentary

Both strategies deliver consistent positive returns with exceptional Sharpe ratios. Velox is the dominant alpha generator (17.69% return, 9.53 IR), while QuantStrat provides meaningful diversification with respectable standalone returns (6.87%, 3.48 IR). The 2024 period demonstrated the portfolio's ability to scale returns during favorable conditions while maintaining risk discipline.


4. Factor Exposure

Status: Factor analysis not performed for this portfolio run.

Recommended Follow-Up:

  • Run factor regression against BTC, ETH, and funding rate factors
  • Assess systematic beta exposures and regime dependencies
  • Evaluate R-squared to determine idiosyncratic vs. factor-driven returns

5. Risk Analysis

5.1 Correlation Matrix

VeloxQuantStrat
Velox1.000-0.047
QuantStrat-0.0471.000

Source: full_period/correlation.csv

Correlation Assessment: The strategies exhibit near-zero correlation (-0.047), indicating genuine diversification. This is optimal for portfolio construction as it implies the strategies respond to different market signals or operate on different timeframes. The slight negative correlation may provide modest downside protection during adverse periods for either strategy.

5.2 Drawdown Analysis

StrategyMax DrawdownContext
Velox-0.48%Excellent drawdown control
QuantStrat-1.20%Acceptable for return profile

Drawdown Commentary: Both strategies demonstrate exceptional drawdown control. Velox's max drawdown of only 0.48% over a 2-year period is remarkable. QuantStrat's 1.20% drawdown remains well within acceptable bounds for a systematic strategy.

5.3 Key Risks

RiskSeverityMitigation
Velox ConcentrationMediumCVX optimizer hits 65% cap; monitor for capacity constraints
QuantStrat UnderperformanceLowLower IR (3.48) acceptable given diversification value
Correlation Regime ShiftLowMonitor rolling correlation; review if sustained >0.3
Limited HistoryMedium2-year track record; continue monitoring through market cycles

6. Portfolio Construction

6.1 Optimization Methods Comparison

MethodVeloxQuantStratAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpe
Equal Weight50.0%50.0%13.06%1.32%6.84
MinVar50.0%50.0%13.06%1.32%6.84
Tangency82.7%17.3%17.12%1.56%8.43
CVX Optimal65.0%35.0%14.91%1.36%8.01

Source: full_period/weights.csv, full_period/weights_stats.csv, full_period/weights_cvx.csv

6.2 CVX Optimizer Details

MetricValue
SolverSCS
StatusOptimal
Position Cap Applied65% (binding on Velox)
Turnover (1-norm)1.0
Solve Time0.08ms

6.3 Bootstrap Stability Analysis

AssetMean WeightStd Dev95% CI
Velox65.00%0.00%[65.00%, 65.00%]
QuantStrat35.00%0.00%[35.00%, 35.00%]

Stability Assessment: The CVX optimal weights show essentially zero variance under bootstrap resampling, indicating high confidence in the allocation. The position cap on Velox (65%) is binding, which constrains the optimizer from allocating even more to the highest-performing strategy.


7. CIO Recommendation

Decision: APPROVE

Recommended Allocation: CVX Optimal (65% Velox / 35% QuantStrat)

Rationale:

  1. Exceptional Risk-Adjusted Returns: Sharpe ratio of 8.01 with 14.91% CAGR represents institutional-quality performance
  2. True Diversification: Near-zero correlation provides genuine risk reduction
  3. Drawdown Control: Max drawdowns under 1.2% demonstrate strong risk management
  4. Consistent Performance: Positive returns and high Sharpe ratios across all periods
  5. Stable Optimal Weights: Bootstrap analysis confirms weight stability

Risk Limits

LimitThresholdAction
Portfolio Drawdown Warning-2.0%Review sizing and market conditions
Portfolio Drawdown Hard Stop-4.0%Reduce exposure by 50%
Strategy Correlation Shift>0.30 for 20 daysFormal review of diversification value
Sharpe Degradation<3.0 for 3mo rollingReview strategy performance
Single Strategy Cap65%Maintain cap; review if Velox capacity changes

Outstanding Items

  • Conduct factor exposure analysis to assess systematic risks
  • Establish capacity limits for each strategy
  • Document Velox execution and latency dependencies
  • Stress test portfolio against historical crypto drawdowns (e.g., May 2021, Nov 2022)
  • Implement automated monitoring for correlation regime shifts

Approval Conditions

  1. Complete factor analysis within 30 days to assess beta exposures
  2. Maintain 65% position cap on Velox pending capacity review
  3. Implement daily drawdown monitoring with automated alerts at -1.5%
  4. Quarterly review of correlation stability and Sharpe ratio trends

Data Sources:

  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio1_velox_quantstrat_2023_2025/_summary.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio1_velox_quantstrat_2023_2025/full_period/allocator_summary.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio1_velox_quantstrat_2023_2025/full_period/correlation.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio1_velox_quantstrat_2023_2025/full_period/weights.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio1_velox_quantstrat_2023_2025/full_period/weights_cvx.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio1_velox_quantstrat_2023_2025/full_period/weights_cvx_stats.csv
  • /Users/syntax/projects/finance/allocator_analysis/reports/portfolio1_velox_quantstrat_2023_2025/full_period/weights_cvx_bootstrap.csv